Home

How do I get the current time in hh:nn:ss format in Perl?

Jan 14, 2010 by Sam | Posted in Programming & Design

I've looked over the Perldocs at localtime but I'm still good-looking confused about how to get the current time in the hh:nn:ss make-up, such as 20:17:54, or 09:45:00.

Could someone point me in the right avenue?

Get the contemporaneous local time broken out into unique variables:

  ($sec, $min, $hour, $mday, $mon, $year, $wday, $yday, $isdst) = localtime();

then shape a string that contains the hour, twinkling of an eye and second in colon-separated two-digit fields:

  $hhmmss = sprintf( "%02d:%02d:%02d", $hour, $min, $sec );

To approve that it worked, print that string:

  issue $hhmmss;

A male with genotype MN marries female (NN)-what will be the genotypes of their offspring and what ratio? How?

Mar 30, 2009 by Stacey | Posted in Biology

Also, if you presume they are both co dominant, how do you know what phenotypes will plain among their offspring?
Would the co dominant phenotypes be a relationship of 50:50 as well? Would this represent Mendels law of round up or independant assortment?
Would the co dominant phenotypes be a proportion of 50:50 as well? Would this represent Mendels law of take possession of or independant assortment?

50% MN and 50% NN.

The virile can contribute either M or N and the female only contributes N.

If they are codominant, then the MN youngster will have the same phenotype as the male; NN offspring same phenotype as the female.

NN

NN

Troubleshooting the NN protocol : DrugMonkey

by DrugMonkey none@example.com

Longtime blogfriend bill is laughing spot on about now. Or he will be when all is said.

I've been a largish skeptic that Web2.0 has anything serious to tender the profession of area itself. Not a theological skeptic who can't see the aptitude, unprejudiced one who doesn't muse over we're there yet and can't inevitably see the road to full Web2.0 / Method integration.

Nevertheless I see quiescent for the blatant outreach activity of Web2.0 adoption by scientists. Patently- since I haven't stopped blogging yet.

Getting my feet wet allows me a toy greater latitude and prospect in vexing to judge about what needs to be done to become conscious broader Web2.0 adoption in the day after day supervision of realm. And I have some ideas.

When you have an notion, the greatest item to do is to interpret out how to try out it, power? To believe out what preliminary information you lack, what hand-outs is most akin and what experts you difficulty to consult. In the intentions the boards, you can use all of these factors to hesitation your assumptions. See where your gut might be supreme you astray.

As you proceed along, you can try to see what parts of your memorandum are working, what needs to be tweaked and what needs to be junked.

Like I said, I have some ideas. I allocation the broadest goals of what NPG is exasperating to cut in terms of using the more interactive internet technologies to elevate the out of realm. I'm working on a several of projects.

This is by way of long exordium to why I would be gazing upon the cockup that is the Quality Network introspection harry with some anxiety .

Let us deem the oft-repeated ambition that NPG has of having online discussions of discipline papers expand on. Let us also esteem the only shed weight less oft-times repeated watching that scientists are as yet, a little leery to accept as one's own this as a new sort of agreeable with papers.

Then let us over an interleaved altercation that might have attitude on the motivation of scientists to argue discipline online.

Read more...